libstore is used to provide a generic interface to access data (read/write)
on backing stores.
It more than just a thin layer between GNU Mach
devices (hd0 for example) and the device node below /dev/...
Available Stores
- bunzip2 store: bunzip2 data on the fly
- concat store: concatenate
- copy store: copy-on-write; discard changes on termination
- device store: Mach device access
- file store: use a file as a kind of block device
- gunzip store: gunzip data on the fly
- ileave store: interleave store (striping)
- nbd store: Linux-compatible network block device
- query store
- remap store
- task store: Mach task store backend
- typed store: chainable stores
- url store: typed store with URL syntax
- zero store: empty block device
At http://www.kataplop.net/pub/info/projets you can find some effort to make some crypto store.
At http://www.trek.eu.org/devel/hurd/crypt-trans-0.0.3.tgz, another package can be found.
Examples
$ settrans --create --active ramdisk0 /hurd/storeio -T copy zero:32M
$ mkfs.ext2 -F -b 4096 ramdisk0
[...]
$ settrans --active --orphan ramdisk0 /hurd/ext2fs ramdisk0
$ df -h ramdisk0/
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
- 32M 1.1M 30M 4% /media/data/home/tschwinge/ramdisk0
This uses settrans and ?storeio to create a ramdisk of 32 MiB by routing
a thusly sized zero store through the copy store, connecting
that to the ramdisk0 node, create a ext2 filesystem on it, and replace the
translator running on the ramdisk0 node with a instance of the ext2fs
translator running on the same node (?translator
stacking).
A (better) alternative would be using the tmpfs
translator, but that one is broken at the moment.
Open Issues
IRC, freenode, #hurd, 2013-07-29
<teythoon> and I read hammys paper about mobile code, is it true that the
store code is loaded into the client? who is the server and who is the
client in this context?
<braunr> teythoon: "store code" ?
<teythoon> libstore
<braunr> the hurd libstore ?
<teythoon> yes
<braunr> hum, what paper ?
<teythoon> braunr:
http://users.student.lth.se/cs07fh9/2009-hammar-hurd-mobility.pdf
<braunr> how nice
<tschwinge> braunr: http://www.gnu.org/software/hurd/news/2010-01-31.html
<teythoon> it raises an important point btw, the authentication done by
processes on the Hurd is one sided, only the client authenticates at the
server
<braunr> yes
<tschwinge> It'S also mentioned in
http://www.gnu.org/software/hurd/hurd/documentation.html -- but of
course, any results he got from his work really should be integrated more
properly into the existing body of documents.
<tschwinge> As with so many other documents/discussions/etc. ;-|
IRC, freenode, #hurd, 2013-11-12
<phcoder> Is it possible to specify hurd root by sth else than device name?
E.g. fs UUID?
<teythoon> phcoder: I do not believe so