Hurd libihash
old
new
hurd-l4 libhurd-ihash
Open Issues
Collisions
Viengoos: new hash function.
IRC, freenode, #hurd, 2008/2009
<neal> so, we need a new ihash implementation
<neal> marcusb: When 80% full, the collision rate is very high.
<neal> marcusb: I tested using 512mb / 4096 entries
<neal> marcusb: Changing the load factor to 30% resulted in my program
running more than an order of magnitude faster.
<marcusb> yeah, it shouldn't get so full
<marcusb> don't we do an exponential back-off in the array size?
<marcusb> of course it's clear we can do much better
<marcusb> the ihash algo is very simple
<marcusb> I'm not even sure it makes much sense to have a generic
library
Reader-Writer Locks
IRC, freenode, #hurd, 2013-12-09
<teythoon> btw, why don't we use rwlocks for serializing access to our
hash tables ?
<braunr> teythoon: we definitely could
<teythoon> ok
<braunr> teythoon: we definitely could use rcu *whistles*
<teythoon> should we ?
<braunr> i don't know
<teythoon> yeah, ofc
<braunr> rwlocks have some overhead compared to mutexes
<braunr> and our mutexes are already quite expensive
<braunr> our condition variables are also not optimized
Object Lookups
Alternatives?
glibc
include/inline-hashtab.h
locale/programs/simple-hash.h
misc/hsearch_r.c
NNS; cf. f46f0abfee5a2b34451708f2462a1c3b1701facd
libstdc++:
unordered_map
,tr1/unordered_map
,ext/hash_map
libiberty:
hashtab.c
CCAN's htable, idtree
Not actually use a hashing data structure; see libports, Open Issues, IRC, freenode, #hurd, 2013-11-14.